Lingo-y goodness

by @ 12:47 pm on 21 December 2006.

The fine folks at The Gawker have skewered the language of bloggers. The list was shared around our virtual newsroom, eliciting a few chuckles and snorts. After brief examination, we find ourselves guilty of using a few of the clichés. Oy.

We may drop one or two, but give up the -y affix followed by “goodness?” Not so much.

Forsaking the -y affix would be mean that we concede to the rigid dictates of prescriptivist linguists, just when we’d gotten them drunk enough to admit that they like anti-prescriptivism. I’m looking at you, Lesley.

We’d also have to give up our love of Buffy The Vampire Slayer. What’s next? Reject Shakespeare? Be quiet about foodgasms?

Elevated self-importance is the new belly lint of the blogosphere? Um, yeah.

We’ll try to clean up our clichés, but until then our goal is to provide one thing: Best. Ethicurean. Posts. Ever.

A big kiss to The Gawker for their amusing original post.

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.ethicurean.com/2006/12/21/lingo-y-goodness/trackback/

2 Responses to “Lingo-y goodness”

  1. Mary Sue Says:

    We’d also have to give up our love of Buffy The Vampire Slayer. What’s next? Reject Shakespeare? Be quiet about foodgasms?

    Amen! Preach it! *waves copy of Fray that just happens to be on her desk at work in the air*

  2. cookiecrumb Says:

    Oh, snap!
    Teh meh.
    /snark

Post a comment

  • A valid email address is required to discourage spam; we will not use or sell it. Before clicking Submit, please type the two words in the red box, separated by a space.

Subscribe without commenting

[Running on WordPress.]

41 queries. 0.486 seconds