Digest - News & Commentary: Kids brainwashed, FDA f*(&s up again, cheap food safe

by @ 5:40 pm on 8 August 2007.

NEWS

Brand aids: In a research study, preschoolers were given identical foods for a taste test, one set in a plain wrapper, the other in a McDonald’s wrapper. The children overwhelmingly preferred the latter, even though it was identical. (MSNBC via AP)

Hard times: Britain’s farmers are holding their breaths, waiting to see if the hoof-and-mouth disease travels beyond a few infected herds. (Telegraph)

No safety net here: The FDA failed to screen at least 1 million pounds of suspect Chinese seafood that ended up on U.S. dinner plates, an Associated Press examination found. (AP)

CO has to go: After receiving pressure from consumers and watchdog groups, Safeway has stopped selling meat treated with carbon monoxide gas, which is an FDA-approved procedure to extend the rosy hue of fresh beef, even as the meat spoils. (Topeka Capital-Journal)

Federal advisory panel finds "no strong evidence" of health hazards from bisphenol A (Washington Post)

Organic candy the future of confectionery, says new report (Food Production Daily)

Woodstock’s famous farm up for sale for $8 million (San Francisco Chronicle)

COMMENTARY

Stop whining, feedlot operators: Are the days of cheap food are over because of the corn-fueled ethanol boom? Not really, say two university researchers. A 30% increase in the price of corn would cause an overall rise in food prices of 1.1%. The article finds that larger forces — like the drought in Australia — are more to blame for the steep rises. (Iowa Ag Review, via FarmPolicy.com)

Silver lining in Farm Bill cloud?: Matthew Blake argues that the current Farm Bill actually has more to commend than to complain about, those pesky subsidies aside. (The Nation)

The New York City perspective on the House Food and Farm Bill (NYC Farm Bill Workgroup)

One Response to “Digest - News & Commentary: Kids brainwashed, FDA f*(&s up again, cheap food safe”

  1. Marc R. aka Mental Masala Says:

    A much longer piece in the LA Times about the report on bisphenol A tells a less optimistic story:

    The scientists ranked their concerns about BPA, concluding they had “some concern” about neurological and behavioral effects in fetuses, infants and children, but “minimal” or “negligible” concern about reproductive effects. The findings put the panel roughly in the middle — between the chemical industry, which has long said there is no evidence of danger to humans, and the environmental activists and scientists who say it is probably harming people.

Post a comment

  • A valid email address is required to discourage spam; we will not use or sell it. Before clicking Submit, please type the two words in the red box, separated by a space.

Subscribe without commenting

[Running on WordPress.]

41 queries. 0.636 seconds