Dispatch from APHA: Searching for the silver lining
Day two of the American Public Health Association meeting found me carting my breakfast (a poorly-executed bagel) to a hyper-air conditioned room to learn about bacteria on meat. Not the most ambient setting for food consumption, but I didn't mind: The panel promised to cover CAFOs and would be led off by David Wallinga, who directs the food and health program at the Minneapolis-based Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, one of my all-time favorite organizations.
And lead it off he did, with a riveting talk on the epidemic of antibiotic resistance. It has everything to do with the way we produce meat: Many CAFOs, which crowd hundreds or thousands of animals into a confined space, do their best to ward off the illness that can quickly sweep through the barns by feeding animals low doses of antibiotics throughout their lives. The industry and NGOs both estimate that around 30 million pounds of antibiotics are used in the livestock sector each year, including penicillin and other common human antibiotics. And an estimated 70% of that is fed to animals that aren’t sick.
The crazy thing is that although antibiotics are prescription-only for humans, CAFO operators have special over-the-counter access. “You really can just go to a feed store and buy a 50-lb. bag of tetracycline,” David lamented. And he should lament – he’s a doctor, and like many in the public health community, he’s seen antibiotic-resistant illnesses skyrocket in recent years.
How is antibiotic use in CAFOs leading to resistant illnesses in humans? David gave us a mini-lesson in bacterial evolution: It’s fast, it involves a lot of mutation, and given prolonged and repeated exposure to antibiotics, the most resistant bacterial strains tend to survive. They survive in manure, which gets into water sources; they survive on the animals as they're taken to slaughter; and they survive around the barns where workers come into regular contact with them. There’s a scientific consensus emerging, he said, that heavy antibiotic use in agriculture is contributing to the transmission of antibiotic resistance in the human population.
And here’s the gross thing: Although it can be transmitted through contaminated water or direct contact with animals, the most common route of transmission is through contaminated food. “Much of the meat we can buy in the grocery store has antibiotic-resistant bacteria on it,” he said. We’re talking resistant Salmonella, E. Coli, staph, and other superbugs. The FDA has estimated that over 150,000 U.S. residents develop Cipro-resistant campylobacter –- a nasty disease that causes severe intestinal distress and can lead to death -- from eating chicken contaminated with resistant bacteria.
Increasingly, doctors are seeing E. Coli superbugs that are resistant to the newest generations of antibiotics. “These are the biggest guns in the arsenal of an infectious disease doctor,” he said. “And E. Coli is beating them.”
Let’s say that again with feeling: In the interest of keeping CAFO livestock alive long enough to fatten them and bring them to slaughter, we are compromising the tools – new and old – that doctors use to fight common but potentially deadly human illnesses. And in case your inner technological optimist just reared its head, let's give it a whack: The discovery of new antibiotics is more and more rare these days, so it's by no means guaranteed that we'll be able to create a new tool out of thin air once the current box is empty.
Hogging the meds
David was followed by John Balbus of the Environmental Defense Fund, who built off the first presentation with a case study of MRSA (a staph infection resistant to methicillin, a newer form of penicillin) and its link to the industrial hog industry. Get this: A full 95% of the antibiotics fed to hogs are human-use drugs, and the oinkers wolf down over 10 million pounds of antibiotics each year.
MRSA has existed for quite a while, but was always isolated in hospitals, where the large number of sick patients and prevalence of antibiotics was prime breeding ground. But in 2005, MRSA was discovered on pig farms across Europe. Evidence suggests it’s evolving in the U.S. as well. (One study found it on 70% of pigs the researchers tested in Iowa and Illinois.) In the U.S., MRSA already has a higher death toll than AIDS.
So what can we do to stop the superbugs? More research, for one. No one’s really been looking at MRSA and hogs in the U.S., nor have we been looking for the presence of MRSA on pork we buy in the supermarkets -- but it’s there. And of course, we need to be investing in sustainable agriculture that avoids the use of antibiotics except when absolutely necessary. Cause really, if you need to jack up your animals to keep them alive, doesn’t that suggest there might be a problem with the system? (That was my editorial comment, not theirs.)
Milking the petroleum teat
The panel switched gears from antibiotic use to another way in which industrial ag is squandering the earth's resources: Fuel dependence. Ashley Winestrom, a PhD candidate at the University of Arizona, presented a study on the impact of peak oil on the agricultural sector. Survey says: Bad. Between fuel-intensive pesticides and fertilizers and the average 1500 miles food travels from farm to table, we currently use 10 calories of energy to produce 1 calorie of food. Failing to invest in less oil-intensive ways of producing food could lead to rising food prices and falling food production, which in the long-term could mean things like recession, increased hunger and malnutrition, conflict over agricultural resources, and large-scale migration. Soil degradation and climate change will -- guess what -- only exacerbate these problems. In her words, energy policy has officially become public health policy.
Finally, a glimpse of silver
Thank goodness it was Alison Gustafson, a North Carolina researcher, who finished up the panel. She shared the results of a community food assessment she carried out in Wayne County, NC, wisely noting that “a big function of how we eat is what food is available in our communities.” She surveyed and then mapped the food chain in Wayne County, from farms to processors to retail distributors, to figure out exactly what was available and what was possible. Looking at those maps was a definite highlight of the morning. (And way more palatable than the pictures of MRSA sores... ugh.)
The first map she showed pinpointed all of the livestock operations in the county: A whopping 200 hog farms, 70% of which were industrial-scale. Then she showed meat processing operations: A measly eight, all large and not interested in taking animals from the small farming operations. “That imbalance is an economic development opportunity for Wayne County right there,” she said. It's an opportunity to promote the type of meat production we want -- smaller scale and antibiotic-free -- by building the infrastructure so those farmers can get their product directly to local consumers. And you can bet that we'll all save gas by doing it this way.
There were hundreds of wheat, corn, cotton and tobacco farmers, many of whom supplied the livestock operations with feed, but there were only nine fruit and vegetable producers. Alison flagged another opportunity to re-localize: Incredibly, there were 37 schools located within 10 miles of those fruit and vegetable producers, an excellent opportunity for farm-to-school programs. As for retail, the only supermarkets were centered in the urban part of the county, while rural residents—as is common nationwide—had very little access to fresh food. More small-scale processing facilities and more farmstands could mean more access for rural residents, without having to drive miles for their supper.
This kind of mapping is a critical tool for researchers, advocates, and communities trying to build a more sustainable food system. As the saying goes, what gets measured gets improved. Visually representing the imbalance between meat producers and processors, for example, or the lack of fruit and vegetable farmers, can help planners and producers fill in those critical gaps.
I chatted with her afterward and recommended she check out Ken Meter’s work at the Crossroads Resource Center in Minnesota. It’s a cool complement to her mapping project: Ken has worked with communities around the country to calculate how much money they spend growing food they can’t eat (field corn, soybeans, cotton, tobacco) and how much they spend buying food that wasn’t produced locally. When you see the numbers, you realize how many economic opportunities are lost when we don’t take full advantage of local production and consumption potential.
I left thinking about new and better possibilities for healthy, low-energy local food systems and forgot about the MRSA-contaminated pork (at least for a little while). Thank goodness, cause it was lunchtime.
No related posts.