New USDA report: 36% of farmers don’t have computers

Farm 2.0? Not so much: A report released Friday by the USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) tallies the numbers for farm computer usage for 2009. It finds:

  • Only 64 percent of farms have access to a computer, leaving 36 percent with no computer access.
  • 59 percent of all farms--so nearly all of those with a computer--have Internet access, up 2 percent from the last survey, which was conducted in 2007.
  • DSL has surpassed dialup as the most common method of farm Internet access, with 36 percent of all farms using it. Dialup use dropped from 47 percent of farms in 2007 to 23 percent in 2009.
  • Only 13 percent of the farms with Internet access get it through satellite or wireless. 11 percent of farms have cable-based systems.

(USDA [pdf], via farmpolicy.com)

Some grist for the mill: A number of policy proposals making the rounds in Washington would require farmers to use electronic (i.e. computer-based) systems to track the movement of livestock or crops, ostensibly in the name of food safety. The National Animal Identification System (NAIS), which is already mandatory for livestock producers in some states, would require food animals to be tagged with electronic tracking devices and their movements recorded in an online database. The Food Safety Enhancement Act, which recently passed the House, would fund a pilot program to track produce from farm to retail using an electronic tracking system. For farmers, that would likely mean having to tag produce boxes with unique IDs, like UPC codes, and scan the ID into the system before the boxes leave the farm.

To the programs' conceptual falacies, we'll add a logistical issue: How can they be expected to work if more than a third of US farmers have no computer access? Or does Uncle Sam plan on instituting a "one laptop per farm" program?

2 Responsesto “New USDA report: 36% of farmers don’t have computers”

  1. They don't care. If you don't have a computer they'll fine you $20,000. They expect you to then buy a computer so they won't fine you $20,000 the next day. Rinse and repeat.

    That is the minimum fine. The fines are daily and cumulative.

    Only bad, disobedient farmers would dare not have a computer. All Heil Fda Usda! (Pronounce it out loud.)

  2. Jim Bynum says:

    For 30 years the EPA, FDA, and USDA have disregarded the laws and promoted the use of bacterial contaminated sewage effluents (reclaimed water / sludge / biosolids) as a cheap source of fertilizer for farms on grazing land, fruits and vegetables. It is the perferred method of disposal under the 1980 national disposal policy.  Now that the damage has become extremely noticable these same folks want to create new laws that implies the producers and processors are responsible.  New documents recently discovered that show thirty years ago EPA, FDA, and USDA knew they were going to cause cattle infections and contaminate food crops.  Yet, sham studies were fund and a public relations program was created to convince farmers and the public otherwise. The documents  and a petition to stop this madness can be found at:
    http://thewatchers.us/index/content.html
    http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/help-ban-sludge
    Jim Bynum, VP
    Help for Sewage Victims

    Retired Safety Consultant
    http://www.thewatchers.us
    http://www.deadlydeceit.com
    Smithville, Mo.